Why Can't India Crack Manufacturing? A Divided Debate
Nov 6, 2026, 23:30 IST
Summary
The debate on India's manufacturing sector features diverse perspectives. Business standard emphasizes the need for education reform and a competitive economy, while another creator highlights historical tariff issues. Anant Goenka from india today expresses optimism about a manufacturing revival, contrasting Adam Posen's concerns about missed opportunities. Sanjeev Krishan calls for more success stories, while PM Modi promotes initiatives supporting local manufacturing.

The debate surrounding India's manufacturing sector has intensified, with various content creators weighing in on the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead. Popular influencer from business standard argues that India must prioritize manufacturing in its economic policy, emphasizing the need for significant reforms in education and skilling. They assert, "India should put manufacturing back at the centre of economic policy," advocating for a more open economy that fosters competition among producers without giving undue advantages to inefficient ones.
Another perspective from business standard highlights the historical context of India's manufacturing struggles. They point out that the country has underinvested in primary and secondary education, which has limited the availability of skilled workers for the manufacturing sector. They argue, "We focused less on primary and secondary education, which would have produced more skilled people for the manufacturing sector," and criticize the slow dismantling of protective tariffs post-1991.
In contrast, Anant Goenka from india today presents a more optimistic view, suggesting that India is on the brink of a manufacturing revival. He mentions a recent report indicating that India is entering a new industrial revolution, especially in sectors like semiconductors and deep technology. Goenka asserts, "It is not a missed opportunity; it is an opportunity yet to be seized," pointing to India's favorable macroeconomic indicators and the global trend towards supply chain diversification as potential advantages.
Adam Posen, a former central banker featured in cnn news 18, adds another layer to the discussion by acknowledging India's strong human capital and infrastructure improvements under the Modi government. However, he also notes that India's limited gains as an alternative to China reflect both U.S. policy failures and domestic reform shortcomings. Posen states, "I think it is disappointing how little India has been able to gain essentially at the expense of China."
On a similar note, Sanjeev Krishan from india today calls for more success stories like the manufacturing of iPhones in India, suggesting that while there are signs of progress, the country needs to create multiple similar success stories. He emphasizes the importance of value addition in design and engineering, stating, "If there is a lot of import with less value created in India, that does not help us."
Meanwhile, the narratives from PM Modi regarding the government's initiatives, such as 'Make in India' and 'Vocal for Local', highlight the government's commitment to boosting manufacturing in states like Tamil Nadu. He asserts that these initiatives are benefiting the local manufacturing sector, which he describes as a source of national pride.
Overall, the debate reveals a spectrum of perspectives: from calls for urgent reforms and education improvements to a more hopeful outlook on India's potential in global manufacturing. The tension between historical challenges and emerging opportunities continues to shape the conversation about why India struggles to fully capitalize on its manufacturing potential.