Did Anything Change After the CJP Protest? A Closer Look

Aug 29, 2026, 16:39 IST

Summary

The debate following the CJP protest reveals differing opinions on its impact. Abhisar Sharma argues the BJP government betrayed Gen Z students, while Ajit Anjum emphasizes the need for accountability, highlighting ongoing student hunger strikes. Prakhar Gupta questions the effectiveness of new leadership, and Najam Sethi suggests the movement lacks political backing. Barkha Dutt notes ongoing government discussions amid the uncertainty.

Did Anything Change After the CJP Protest? A Closer Look

The aftermath of the recent CJP protest has sparked a heated debate among various content creators, each presenting differing views on whether the protest resulted in any meaningful change. Abhisar Sharma, a journalist, contends that the BJP government has betrayed the trust of Gen Z students. He claims, "the BJP government promised to withdraw all FIRs filed against Gen Z protesters," yet the Supreme Court's directive to continue investigating these FIRs contradicts this assurance. Sharma points to an investigation by NewsLaundry linking a truck filled with stones to the protest area before July 20, implying that the government is using media to discredit protesters, including a controversial statement from actress Kangana Ranaut branding Gen Z women as drug users.

In contrast, Ajit Anjum, a prominent commentator, addresses the broader implications of the government's actions, focusing on the lack of accountability within the administration. He argues that the persistent issue of paper leaks in examinations stems from ministers, like Dharmendra Pradhan, feeling no fear of losing their positions. Anjum emphasizes that Pradhan’s resignation should be viewed as a step toward accountability rather than a definitive solution, stating, "Dharmendra Pradhan faces no action from Narendra Modi despite paper leaks and student suicides."

Anjum also highlights the seriousness of the protests, noting that over 20 students are on hunger strike and have been enduring extreme weather conditions for weeks. He questions the narrative that the protest lacks seriousness, stating, "How serious should it be? We've been sitting here for 27 days in 45-degree heat!" He echoes the demand for Pradhan's resignation and urges for compensation for families of students who have tragically taken their lives due to the stress of the situation.

Another voice in this discussion is from Prakhar Gupta, a YouTuber, who expresses skepticism about the government's changes, particularly regarding Pralhad Joshi's appointment as the new Education Minister. He remarks, "I thought if they were changing him, they’d pick someone really educated... I don't think Pralhad Joshi is capable of doing anything remarkable or miraculous."

Meanwhile, Najam Sethi, a political analyst, suggests that the movement may not have the necessary political backing to sustain itself in the long run. He posits, "Without full political-party support, the leaderless movement cannot become a political movement," indicating that while the protest may continue, it lacks the structural support needed for significant change.

Mojo Story's Barkha Dutt adds another layer by noting ongoing discussions between the Modi government and the CJP, suggesting that the administration is still actively engaging with the issues raised by the protesters. However, without concrete outcomes, the sentiment remains that not much has changed.

The debate reveals a complex interplay of perspectives on the impact of the CJP protest. While some creators assert that the protest has not led to any significant changes, others highlight the ongoing struggles of students and the demand for accountability from the government. The varying opinions underscore the uncertainty and tension surrounding the future of the movement and its potential to effect real change.


Next Article

Loading clips…