Who is Responsible if Sonam Wangchuk Dies?

The debate surrounding the potential consequences of Sonam Wangchuk's hunger strike has sparked intense discussions among various content creators. Each voice brings a distinct perspective on the government's role and accountability in this situation.

Youtuber Dhruv Rathee argues that the government is unlikely to respond effectively to Wangchuk's protests, drawing parallels to the case of Professor G.D. Agrawal, who died after 111 days of fasting for the Ganga's cleanliness. Rathee emphasizes, "The truth is, friends, that Narendra Modi does not care. This government is utterly incompetent." He calls for a nationwide movement on July 20, urging opposition leaders to join a march at Jantar Mantar to amplify the public's voice against the government’s inaction. Rathee insists that the public must unite to expose the government, stating, "This issue is not limited to Sonam Wangchuk; it’s a national movement."

In a similar vein, journalist Abhisar Sharma highlights the lack of government response to Wangchuk's ongoing hunger strike, which has now reached its 19th day. He criticizes the government for its perceived indifference, noting that Wangchuk has expressed feelings of weakness but remains resolute in his cause. Sharma points out, "This government has become so shameless that they are still not listening to the voice of Sonam Wangchuk." He also expresses disappointment in prominent celebrities, like Aamir Khan and Shahrukh Khan, for not publicly supporting Wangchuk, contrasting their silence with the vocal support from actor Omi Vaidya.

Adding to the discourse, Pragya Mishra, a popular Youtuber, raises critical questions about accountability. She notes the absurdity of the government's silence amid Wangchuk's deteriorating health, asking, "If something happens to Sonam Wangchuk, who will be responsible?" Mishra stresses the need for the government to acknowledge its failures, particularly regarding recent paper leaks, and to assure reforms. She argues, "The government should be listening to the people who elected them; it's a democracy."

While all creators share a common concern for Wangchuk's wellbeing, they diverge in their focus on the implications of celebrity silence and the broader governmental responsibilities. Rathee emphasizes collective public action, Sharma critiques the government’s moral standing, and Mishra questions accountability in democratic governance. The urgency of the situation has united these voices in a plea for government action, yet their approaches reflect different angles of the same pressing issue.

As the countdown to July 20 continues, the question remains: If Sonam Wangchuk dies, who will bear the responsibility for this tragic outcome? The creators collectively underscore that the onus lies heavily on the government, but they also call for greater public engagement to ensure that such a fate does not come to pass.